Corona trial proves Pinoys ready for Jury
Corona trial proves
Pinoys ready for jury
By BERTENI “TOTO” CATALUÑA CAUSING
Editor-in-chief,
Dyaryo Magdalo
Online and other sites have put up polls
asking readers, bloggers and listeners to render their judgments: whether Chief
Justice Renato C. Corona is guilty or not.
Amazingly,
all the voters for or against can explain why they render their judgments with keen
sense on the evidence presented, including testimonies that they adjudge as
believable or not.
This
only proves that the Filipinos are ready to sit in every jury trial that may be
established to try big cases like the Ampatuan Massacre
All these voters witnessed the
entirety or the substantial part of the impeachment trial of the Chief Justice
and most of them gave intelligent observations on the otherwise boring
presentation of documents as evidence.
Other online citizens resort to
making forecasts as to who among the senators they think will vote for the
conviction, who will not and who will abstain.
Others present written articles analyzing every issue as against the
evidence presented.
The bottom line here is that FILIPINOS
ARE PROVING TO BE READY TO BE JURORS IN EVERY CRIMINAL TRIAL.
They
know how to appreciate pieces of evidence and testimonies whether these are
believable or not without applying the Rules of Evidence principles.
And that ability the Filipinos shows
now will surely shine when the most impartial among them are chosen to sit in
every jury trial or every grand jury in every province or cities.
A brief analysis consolidated from
hundreds of Facebook citizens, email groups’ members, bloggers and those who
post comments can represent well the judgments made by the Filipinos, as
written below.
How, can we close our eyes and conscience
to the truth that CJ Corona admitted having deposits of $2.4 million and P80.7
million in banks?
How can we believe in the claims of
the Chief Justice that the P80.7 million in his name in various banks and accounts
are in fact co-mingled funds that some of those belong to some other persons,
including his children, wife and the Basa Guidote Enterprises, Inc.?
How can we believe that some of the $2.4
million deposits in his name in various banks and accounts are also co-mingled
with the funds of other persons?
How
can we believe in his testimonies only when he did not present documents to
back these claims or to know how much of those belong to him personally and how
much belong to others?
How
can we believe in his testimonies to believe that there have indeed been other
persons who would entrust their millions in the hands of the Chief Justice?
How
can we believe in his testimonies when the only evidence he offered were his
tears and a story about his grandson who was angry about what happened?
How
can we believe in his opinion that he is not compelled to disclose in his SALN
because of the foreign currency deposit secrecy law?
How
can we believe in his explanations that the some condo units were not recorded
in his SALN?
How
can we believe the non-listing in the SALN was done in bad faith if the people
saw that the same act has been for ten years?
Wow,
indeed, we have matured more than enough!
Let’s
us then go for a jury system of justice.
It
is the only system of justice where the President, Vice-President, Senators and
Representatives cannot make their influence control the results of every search
for justice.
Jury
trials are like the impeachment court minus the questioning done by the
senators.
In
jury trials, the jurors just observe the evidence presented and the testimonies
uttered before deliberating to vote for conviction or acquittal.
Grand
jury system is almost the same, except that the purpose of its judgment in
every case is to decide whether to file a criminal case in court. In this, the jurors will listen to the
prosecutors and policemen present evidence to convince the jurors to authorize
the filing in court of the criminal cases being presented. The jurors may ask clarificatory questions,
legal or factual.
As
expected, if it were a case of a former president being charged with electoral
sabotage, grand jurors will examine the evidence presented to know whether the
prosecutors have solid proofs to have a good chance of getting convictions, otherwise
they will just reject the case for it would only waste the time and efforts of
the prosecutors and the courts.
Now,
any decision of a trial jury or a grand juror will not be suspected as
politically-motivated because it is the people themselves who will act as
jurors, by randomly choosing from them who should sit.
Those
chosen by raffle, probably by computers scanning of registered voters, in the
first round shall be subjected to further screening to determine the final 12 and
two alternates to serve as trial jurors.
Depending on the gravity of the
risks, these jurors shall be secretly guarded to avoid getting repercussions
from litigants, their faces and names kept secret from the public.
Those
chosen to serve as the final 23 and two alternates to serve for six months as
jurors of the Grand Jury shall also be kept secret in order to preserve their
independence against dangerous litigants like the Ampatuans.
Finally,
since it is the people themselves acting as the judges, we can now say that we
are truly giving back to the people that power to judge and the power to accuse
in court, which powers origin from them along with the power to execute and
make laws, it being declared in the Constitution that “sovereignty resides in
the people and all powers emanate from them.”
And
if Jury System is established, only then we can say that the Philippines will
have a government that is truly by the people, for the people, and of the
people.
Only
then that the rebels will give peace a chance because they would know they
would have equal chances in their searches for justice for the discriminations by
the rich against the poor and the Christians against the Muslims or vice versa.
Give
life to the true Peole’s Justice System.
Comments