Unjust judges are roots of rebellion
Unjust
judges are roots of rebellion
Unjust
decisions are not a story in any country whose justice system is ruled by the
jury of the people. Judges there merely impose the will of the group of ordinary men where the will is given after the trial.
Moreover,
there has been no rebellion in a country where the judges are the people
themselves chosen from among themselves randomly and by means of screening
procedure to determine who have the capacity to discern factual issues to be
able to say which are true and which are not.
Examples of these countries are South Korea, Japan, Australia, England,
Canada, Hong Kong, and many others.
Worse, equally
common in the Philippines are JUDGES WHO ISSUE RULINGS DESPITE IT BEING
ELEMENTARY TO BE WRONG IN POINT OF LAW.
Whatever
kind of judges, they are THE CAUSES OF REBELLION IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE
PEOPLE. They are the reasons why communism and Muslim separation movements have gained footholds in the Philippines.
The judges who did not punish the Spaniards were the reasons why many Filipinos rebelled against Spain.
They are
the judges who justify why people complain for injustice and cry out loud that
justice is for the rich.
Saying
these two judges in Cavite have done enough suffering, discrimination and
oppression against them, urban poor residents of Cavite whose hearts are raging
for justice against illegal eviction from the respective house-and-lot units
they supposedly bought under Pag-Ibig plan did their best to be able to raise money to spend for
expensive photocopying of voluminous documents so that their complaint against
these magistrates is filed with the Supreme Court.
These urban
poor people have been complaining that the developer cancelled their contracts
to sell over their socialized houses BY NOT FOLLOWING THE COMMAND OF THE MACEDA
LAW.
What the
developer did was it merely declared, unilaterally or by itself alone, the
contracts to sell as cancelled without first giving to the urban poor a grace
period of 60 days to pay arrears without interest.
This grace
period is MANDATORY under the Maceda Law, or Republic Act No. 6552.
If after
the grace period the buyers failed to pay the arrears, the developer has the
right to cancel the contract to sell ONLY by means of giving the buyer a
notarized letter expressing the decision to cancel.
Only after
thirty (30) days from the day of the receipt of the notarized letter of
cancellation can it be automatically considered that the contract is cancelled.
Note that
there is no other way of cancelling contracts to sell in transactions involving
buying by installments. Cancellation must follow the Maceda law.
The Maceda
Law is very strict because selling real property for houses or otherwise is impressed
with public interest.
So that the
Maceda Law does not respect whatever is the form of the contract, whether in
the form of contracts to sell or real estate mortgage. As long as the contracts require payments by installments,
foreclosure cannot be used to forfeit the Maceda rights of the buyers.
So that
members of Camachile Subdivision in General Trias, Cavite have decided to file
a complaint before the Supreme Court against two judges.
The
complaint can be read at this link: http://totocausing.blogspot.com/2013/06/urban-poor-to-file-admin-case-for-gross.html.
Comments