INVICTUS!
INVICTUS!
The directors of NPC who signed the NPC board resolution to
file a case of pilferage against me will be conclusively proved to have malice
or intention to swear to falsities against me if they will not stop the filing
of that charges against me.
This is because all those who signed have prior knowledge
that the facts alleged in the board resolution they signed are false. They have
actual malice.
First, they investigated the building electrician, Lauro, as
to why my small room at the ground floor at the back of the NPC Bldg. was
connected to an electrical line of the edifice.
They grilled Lauro and even kicked him out of job and only to be
returned to work immediately later. They were shocked when Lauro admitted to them
it was Jerry S. Yap who directed him to connect the line in that small room to
the NPC line.
The first reason of Mr. Yap was that our small law office
did not have a separate line to Meralco for it has ever since been getting its
electric supply direct from the NPC Bldg. and the best available remedy was to
connect to the NPC line.
The second reason of Mr. Yap was that our small law office
did not charge any acceptance fees for all the cases it handled for the NPC and
its members.
Our law office led by Atty. Cirilo P. Sabarre, Jr. and Atty.
Ronaldo E. Renta won the total of eight (8) cases filed by the GSIS against the
NPC and its officials of 2006-2008, including the criminal cases of qualified
theft that GSIS filed against the officers of the NPC for selling the historic
Vicente Manansala mural. Now, the GSIS
is moving heaven and earth to reverse the victories by running to the Supreme
Court, which dismissed the appeal on the criminal case.
Our law office also served pro bono to all journalists
asking for the help of NPC to defend them in their libel cases and prosecute
their personal cases that they cannot do without us because of lack of money.
As an act of gratitude, Mr. Yap invoked his authority to
sign and negotiate for all lease contracts for all spaces of the 57-year-old
structure to allow my office to get electric supply from NPC bldg. as part of
our lease contract of P10,000.00 a month for the use of a third-floor room and
the said small room. For all the more
than five (5) years that the office stayed at NPC, we paid a total of at least
P600,000.00.
Imagine that despite giving free services, our law office
contributed that much to NPC?
To prove these facts, Mr. Yap executed an affidavit of
affirmation. Proving the fact of full payments are the checks used in paying
the rents.
The directors who will be minded by their conscience still
have time to execute affidavits retracting their signatures in that damning
resolution before the case of pilferage is filed against me. Should they fail,
I will be compelled to employ the full might of the law as a natural and legal recourse
to self preservation and I still say there will be nothing personal in that act
because I cannot be selective to spare any friend who signed.
INVICTUS!
Comments