Berteni "Toto" Cataluña Causing: Ombudsman terribly erred in convicting NBI agent
Berteni "Toto" Cataluña Causing: Ombudsman terribly erred in convicting NBI agent: PRESS RELEASE: From: ATTY. BERTENI “TOTO” CATALUÑA CAUSING totocausing@yahoo.com , berteni.causing@gmail.com , 09178...
CRAZY DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN CASIMIRO?
Ombudsman terribly erred in convicting NBI agent
The Office of the Ombudsman terribly erred in rendering decision dismissing from the service National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) agent Junnel Malaluan, according to lawyer Berteni C. Causing.
The legal counsel stressed that the first terrible error was committed by Deputy Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro when he disregarded the security sentinel’s logbook showing that the car allegedly used for kidnapping did not enter and did not exit the bureau’s gate at the times alleged by the complainant policemen.
Causing said the second terrible error was committed when Casimiro did not follow the command of the Constitution in Section 14 of Article VIII when it decided the case without stating the issues, reasons and the law used in its conclusion.
“The decision of the Ombudsman reveals its investigating officer, reviewing officer and Deputy Ombudsman Casimiro mad the judgment by their ignorance of the law,” Causing stressed.
(READ MORE AT THIS LINK: http://totocausing.blogspot.com/2012/10/ombudsman-terribly-erred-in-convicting.html )
CRAZY DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN CASIMIRO?
Ombudsman terribly erred in convicting NBI agent
The Office of the Ombudsman terribly erred in rendering decision dismissing from the service National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) agent Junnel Malaluan, according to lawyer Berteni C. Causing.
The legal counsel stressed that the first terrible error was committed by Deputy Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro when he disregarded the security sentinel’s logbook showing that the car allegedly used for kidnapping did not enter and did not exit the bureau’s gate at the times alleged by the complainant policemen.
Causing said the second terrible error was committed when Casimiro did not follow the command of the Constitution in Section 14 of Article VIII when it decided the case without stating the issues, reasons and the law used in its conclusion.
“The decision of the Ombudsman reveals its investigating officer, reviewing officer and Deputy Ombudsman Casimiro mad the judgment by their ignorance of the law,” Causing stressed.
(READ MORE AT THIS LINK: http://totocausing.blogspot.com/2012/10/ombudsman-terribly-erred-in-convicting.html )
Comments