Why PMA stays silent on 8-1 vote?
Why PMA stays
silent on 8-1 vote?
1st Class Cadet Aldrin Cudia |
Firmly believing
that 1st Class Cadet Aldrin Jeff P. Cudia is innocent in the accusation that he
lied in explaining why he was late for two minutes in his class, his supporters
that included this blogger are demanding that the Philippine Military Academy (PMA)
speak up now about the assertion that the judgment was rigged from eight (8)
for guilty and one (1) for acquittal to a unanimous nine (9) for guilty and the
“dagdag-bawas” was resorted to by the Honor Committee (HonCom) to compel him to
resign or face ostracism.
The matter has
become a serious national issue so that the PMA must now speak up in the exercise
of its power of control and supervision over all its cadets whose schooling and
salaries as students are paid for by the people’s money.
The cry from
the public has become more deafening in demanding for a probe into why the judgment
on the guilt or innocence of Cadet Cudia was rigged or was subjected to “dagdag-bawas”
because two (2) cases have in fact been filed against the HonCom members upon
the assertion that they manipulated the voting.
One complaint of violation of the Honor Code
for cheating in the voting was filed by PMA Class Dado Enrique, a baron of
Class ’83.
The other complaint was filed by Cudia himself
upon the basis that one of the HonCom revealed that the first voting was 8-1
and then a second voting was done after the committee held a “chambering” or an
executive session to compel the dissenter to change vote.
Considering the charges that the HonCom
members themselves committed cheating are so serious, the same should have been
acted on swiftly in order not stir further the suspicion of the public.
If the HonCom
is found guilty of vote rigging, it means that their judgment of guilt meted
out on Cudia is void.
The PMA has
now a new superintendent has been ordered on 20 February 2014 by General
Emmanuel “Manny Sundalo” Bautista, the chief of staff of the Armed Forces of
the Philippines, to investigate into the matter, including the proceedings
done.
The public is
also urging the PMA to look into the footage of the video recording of Cadet
Cudia’s trial.
The relatives of Cudia have been crying out
that there was that video recording that can settle all issues once and for
all.
Behind this demand for the PMA to speak up,
the public expressed apprehension that the investigation will only be a mockery
of justice or moro-moro because those appointed to investigate are all from the
PMA.
This blogger wants to state clearly:
“I want to clarify to all PMA alumni and
cadets as well as cadettes that in siding with Aldrin in this issue we are not
against the Honor Code.
“Our degree of interest in making that Code stronger
is as strong as the alumni.
“That is why we want this suspect voting
procedure to be proved and cleared.
“This is the only way to assure the people
who finance the cadets’ schooling and training to be fine gentlemen and
officers serving for the defense of the State: That the PMA is always there to act
on immediately for any suspicion in the proceedings done by the Honor Committee
implementing the Code.”
Comments